Title: Colonial Development of Islamic Family Law in the British Straits Settlements and the Netherlands Indies
نویسنده
چکیده
This chapter traces how British and Dutch colonial officials gathered and organized knowledge on Islamic law in the British Straits Settlements (Penang, Malacca and Singapore) and the Netherlands Indies (present-day Indonesia) respectively. Despite clear differences between the legal systems and administrative structures of the two colonies, colonial authorities shared a considerable amount of religious literature and knowledge of local Muslim subjects. Through the process of codification and translation, Islamic law, restricted to the realm of personal law, was streamlined since multiple interpretations on a single issue by Muslim jurists and judges were no longer tolerated. In this way, the practice of Islamic law was drastically transformed. While implementing Islamic law, both colonial powers remained guarded against an inadvertent cession of power to colonial subjects. Although they readily dispensed Islamic legal authority within the limited confines of personal law, either directly or through intermediaries, colonial bureaucrats anxiously strove to ensure that their jurisdictions were not encroached upon by local religious laws beyond defined limits. Nonetheless, Dutch authorities were more willing to consult and preserve local religious authorities in leadership positions within the new colonial legal structure, than the British who were able to avoid depending on the local religious elite, by choosing to rely on a rich corpus of judicial precedents, codified and translated legal manuals as well as administrative experience in British India. In contrast to British knowledge of Islam that was more general and expansive within the Empire, Dutch knowledge of Islamic law arose specifically in the Netherlands Indies. Not only that, Dutch bureaucrats seemed to be keener on participating in intellectual debates on Islam than their British counterparts who deliberately avoided discussions on substantive laws. Ultimately however, both the Straits Settlements and the Netherlands Indies were more affected by changes to formal legal administrative structures which remained constantly in flux till the end of the colonial period.
منابع مشابه
The founding of the medical school in Singapore in 1905.
This article traces briefly the origins of medical education in the early years of the Straits Settlements (Singapore, Penang and Malacca), which culminated in the founding of Medical School in Singapore in 1905. The first attempt was made in the early 19th century, when boys were recruited from local schools as Medical Apprentices to be trained as "assistant doctors". They were to assist the B...
متن کاملRadiology in Malaya in the 1920s.
From 1909-1941, the Malay Peninsula consisted of the four Federated Malay States (FMS) of Selangor, Perak, Pahang and Negri Sembilan. Kedah, Pedis, Kelantan, Terengganu and Johore comprised the Unfederated Malay States. In the Unfederated States, the British share in the administration was less than in the FMS, where there was a largely British administration with certain Malay perogatives. Sin...
متن کاملLunatics and lunatic asylums in early Singapore (1819-1869).
A BRIEP r6sume of the establishment and administration of the Straits Settlements is necessary to the understanding of the developments to be described. In the seventeenth century, the English East India Company was ousted by the Dutch from the islands of the East Indies. The East India Company then decided to concentrate on India itself, and in 1763, after having defeated France, its main riva...
متن کاملA historical Review of British Role in Iran-Iraqi Dispute on the Shatt-al-Arab Waterway
Relations between the third world countries in different parts of Asia and Africa during the 19th and 20th centuries, to a great extent, were influenced by the presence and policies of colonial powers. Thus, for a better understanding of roots of disputes and issues existing between these countries concerning frontiers, disputed Islands, political and prejudicial tensions, we need to study pas...
متن کاملTexts and Politics: Postcolonial Revaluations of two British Classics
The major argument of this essay is that Kipling treats the colonial subject as the "other," and Forster proves to be almost as pro-Empire as writers like Kipling. Nevertheless, A Passage to India is eloquent in rejecting British values and introducing Indian voices. This novel records a shift in attitude in terms of exposing the bitter realities about and attitudes of British imperialists. Des...
متن کامل